WOW! Here Is Why Jurors Are Looking at Naked Photos of Harvey Weinstein in Trial
The jury in the Harvey Weinstein rape trial was given the task to review naked photos of Weinstein as part of the evidence in the trial.
Jurors were reviewing the photos to see if the extreme allegations brought by plaintiff Jessica Mann are true regarding Weinstein’s genitalia. Spectators were not given the opportunity to see the photos.
This was my suggestion as well. Show the jury what Weinstein looks like naked and that will be an immediate indicator of whether or not Mann has been telling the truth. If so, then it’s also very likely that the others who are accusing him of sexual abuse are telling the truth as well.
Mann made a most outrageous claim against Weinstein.
“He would talk very dirty to me about fantasies and things, and compare me to the other things actresses that he said were doing kinky, dirty things with him. He always wanted to film me. I never gave him permission.”
“He would say, ‘Do you like my big, fat, Jewish d**k?’” continued Mann. “He has an extreme scarring that I didn’t know, maybe [he] was a burn victim …”
“The first time I saw him fully naked,” she told the court, according to the report. “I thought he was deformed and intersex…He does not have testicles, and it appears that he has a vagina.”
It was reported that when she said this, Weinstein lowered his head. Is that a sign that he’s ashamed of what she just said because it’s true, or is it a sign of amusement because of how ridiculous the claim is?
“It was very bad,” she said, when asked to describe his hygiene, according to the report. “He smelled like s— — excuse me, sorry, like poop. He just was dirty.”
“He also peed on me once.”
Based on the reaction of the jury, the allegations may be true because more than one juror had adverse reactions to the photos.