Donald Trump’s quest for the 2024 Republican nomination hinges, in part, on mending fences with pro-life groups. Despite their heavy criticism of his shifting stance on abortion, several key organizations are cautiously warming up to his candidacy. This hesitant rapprochement reflects a complex interplay of pragmatism, past achievements, and lingering ideological disagreements.

Trump’s pro-life bona fides have been a subject of intense debate. He has expressed varying levels of support for federal abortion bans, at times declaring indifference and in other instances advocating for a 15-week limit. These inconsistencies drew sharp rebukes from groups like Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America and Students for Life.

However, the tide seems to be turning. These same organizations, while acknowledging Trump’s imperfect alignment with their ideals, are increasingly highlighting his practical effectiveness. “Is he the most pro-life person? No,” admitted Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life, “but he keeps his deals.” This sentiment reflects a pragmatic assessment of Trump’s past record, particularly his appointment of conservative judges who ultimately overturned Roe v. Wade.

Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, struck a similar chord. Though critical of Trump’s lack of commitment to a specific federal ban, she conceded that his presidency “built an enormous amount of trust with pro-life voters… as his presidency was the most consequential in American history for the pro-life cause.”

Despite this cautious rapprochement, tensions remain. Trump’s advocacy for abortion exceptions in certain cases and his critique of stricter state bans like Florida’s six-week law continue to ruffle feathers. These inconsistencies highlight the inherent difficulty of balancing his own political calculus with the demands of a fiercely committed base.

The Trump campaign, for its part, is attempting to navigate this tightrope by emphasizing his role in dismantling Roe v. Wade and his focus on painting Democrats as the true extremists on abortion. This framing resonates with many pro-life voters who prioritize defeating Democratic candidates even if it means compromising on ideological purity.

Ultimately, the success of Trump’s outreach to pro-life groups remains to be seen. His past achievements hold undeniable sway, but his evolving stance on abortion continues to spark skepticism. If he can effectively walk this tightrope, balancing pragmatism with a nod towards pro-life principles, he may yet secure the crucial support he needs to clinch the GOP nomination.