Shocking revelations from Trump’s legal team expose concerning details about the jury in his trial. In a Manhattan courtroom, jury selection began in the unprecedented criminal trial of former President Donald J. Trump. Alina Habba, Trump’s legal spokeswoman, revealed startling insights into the process, highlighting concerns about potential bias within the jury pool.

Over half of the initial prospective jurors were swiftly excused, sparking fears about the trial’s fairness. Habba expressed dismay over the inclusion of individuals with ties to the Biden campaign, raising questions about impartiality. Despite efforts to ensure a fair trial, restrictions imposed by the judge on questioning jurors’ political affiliations have left the defense wary. As Trump’s legal battles intensify, the composition of the jury emerges as a pivotal factor that could shape the outcome of these landmark cases.

In a startling turn of events at the Manhattan courtroom, Alina Habba, the legal spokeswoman for former President Donald J. Trump, unveiled shocking revelations regarding the ongoing jury selection for his historic criminal trial. As jury selection commenced, concerns about the impartiality of the process were brought to the forefront. According to Habba, over half of the initial prospective jurors were promptly dismissed after expressing doubts about their ability to remain unbiased.

During an interview with Benny Johnson, Habba voiced her apprehensions about the integrity of the jury pool, particularly regarding potential affiliations with the Biden campaign. Johnson set a charged tone by labeling the jury pool as “absolutely ratchet,” a sentiment echoed by Habba, who expressed deep concerns over potential bias influencing the trial’s outcomes.

The conversation then delved into past legal precedents, notably the O.J. Simpson case, to illustrate worries about juror impartiality. Johnson remarked on the jurors in the O.J. Simpson case, stating, “We knew he killed everyone.”

Habba alluded to the specific restrictions imposed by Judge Merchan during the jury selection process, arguing that such limitations could severely impact the defense’s ability to ensure a fair trial.

Further exacerbating the issue, Habba revealed that individuals currently employed by the Biden campaign were allowed in the jury pool for the E. Jean Carroll case—a situation she found deeply problematic. “There’s people that… were working currently for the Biden campaign. And I didn’t want those people sitting on a jury for President Trump.”

As Trump faces 34 state charges in connection to a pre-2016 election “hush money” payment, the significance of the jury’s composition cannot be overstated. Habba admitted to the tactical nature of jury selection, emphasizing the critical role it plays in shaping trial outcomes. With the trial marking the first of four criminal cases against Trump, the stakes are undeniably high as the legal battle unfolds.