Special Counsel John Durham Bust Clintons with Back-to-Back Bombs
Special Counsel John Durham is still going after the Clintons and everyone involved in the Russian collusion hoax against President Trump years ago.
It’s unfathomable that people are still denying that it was a hoax even though it has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. But that just goes to show you that liberals honestly do not care to find out what the actual facts are about something before blurting their opinion. They only care about their feelings and what they’ve been told by other liberals as long as it is beneficial to their own personal ideology.
According to new filings by special counsel John Durham’s team, former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who is accused of lying to the FBI when he claimed he wasn’t representing anyone while handing over information about then-candidate Donald Trump in 2016, also made false statements to CIA officers in a meeting after Trump was sworn in.
According to a text message recently released by prosecutors, Sussmann warned James Baker, the FBI’s chief counsel at the time, that he had “time-sensitive (and sensitive)” material to discuss before the two met. Sussmann claimed in the same message that he was “going on my own—not on behalf of a client or organization,” despite the fact that prosecutors say he was authorized to deliver the information by Rodney Joffe, a technology executive, and billed the Clinton campaign for the service.
This isn’t the only development that has come of the investigation as of lately. It was also reported that the evidence that was used in the Russia collusion hoax was determined by the CIA to have been ‘user created’.
According to the NY Post,
Special Counsel John Durham asserted in a court filing Friday that the CIA concluded data from Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann alleging coordination between Donald Trump and Russia was “not technically plausible” and was “user created.”
In the filing, Durham responded to objections from Sussmann’s defense regarding what evidence could be admissible at Sussmann’s trial, which is scheduled to begin next month. Sussmann is accused of lying to the FBI by saying he was not attending a meeting on behalf of a particular client when he was actually presenting the information on behalf of the Hillary Clinton campaign and a technology executive with whom he worked.
Durham in February first revealed that the government would establish during trial that among the data “exploited” was domain name system (DNS) internet traffic pertaining to “a particular healthcare provider, Trump Tower, Donald Trump’s Central Park West apartment building, and the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP).”
Will they actually finally nail Hillary Clinton? I highly doubt it, but let’s continue to hope so.
Sources:
The Epoch Times