Just One Hour After the Inauguration of Biden, the WHO Admits This About COVID
The true colors of the government both foreign and domestic are showing their colors and just how much they hated President Trump.
Now that Biden has been sworn in and has stated that the U.S. will be rejoining the World Health Organization, they are sharing more information.
Just an hour after Biden was sworn in, they released a report from earlier in the month saying that the testing results for COVID-19 grossly overstates the true number of cases resulting in a lot of false positives.
In a tweet from Andy Swan, which has not been deleted or removed, he said:
“Literally one hour after Biden takes the oath, the WHO admits that PCR testing at high amplification rates alters the predictive value of the tests and results in a huge number of false positives.”
He’s not telling me anything new, and I’m sure you’re well aware of that as well. Of course, there is a huge number of false positives. That’s also why you see people test positive in one nostril and not the other. It’s why you see people take four tests and two of them are false and two of them are positive. It’s why you can test motor oil or Coca-Cola and those test positive as well.
I’m not making any of those things up, these are all true events that happened.
The whole thing is a huge scam.
For some reason, they are now trying to scrub this off of the internet, in fact, I when I tried to search for this with Google, I didn’t get any related results. However, when I used DuckDuckGo to do my search, I was able to find what I needed.
This is what the WHO stated:
Users of IVDs must read and follow the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is recommended by the manufacturer.
WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.
I know a lot of that is just gibberish, but it’s just saying that there are a lot of false positives.