Jill Biden is facing criticism on social media for comparing efforts to remove sexually explicit books from schools to censorship in Nazi Germany during World War II. In a speech, Biden said, “History teaches us that democracies don’t disappear overnight. They disappear slowly. Subtly. Silently. A book ban. A court decision.

A ‘don’t say gay’ law. Before World War II, I’m told, Berlin was the center of LGBTQ culture in Europe.” Critics argue that her remarks are nonsensical and insensitive, sparking a wave of mockery online.

Many are questioning the logic behind Biden’s comparison, with some pointing out that parents and Republicans advocating for the removal of explicit material from school curriculums are not akin to Nazis. One critic wrote, “Jill Biden was trying to compare censorship and book bans/burning that happened in Austria, in the 1930s. She suggested that any parents, Republicans, etc who want explicit books out of their children’s schools were basically like Nazis.”

Others emphasize the importance of age-appropriate education and express concerns about exposing children to potentially harmful content.

However, they argue that Biden’s comparison goes too far and detracts from meaningful discussions about education policy. Despite Biden’s intention to highlight the administration’s support for the LGBT community, her remarks have been widely condemned as misguided and offensive. Social media users have been quick to mock her statements, questioning her understanding of history and education.

In the midst of heated debates about censorship, it’s crucial to approach the issue with nuance and respect for differing perspectives. While there are valid concerns about protecting children from inappropriate material, extreme comparisons to Nazi Germany only serve to polarize the conversation further.