In a stunning revelation that’s sending shockwaves through the political landscape, it has come to light that CISA, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, knowingly suppressed any dissenting voices questioning the integrity of mail-in ballots before the 2020 election.

Documents recently uncovered have exposed CISA’s complicity in silencing legitimate concerns about the security of mail-in voting. Despite acknowledging the inherent vulnerabilities in the process, they opted to silence critics and push forward with policies that endangered the election’s sanctity.

According to the documents, CISA was fully aware of the risks posed by mail-in and absentee voting, conceding that they are less secure than in-person voting. Yet, they chose to disregard these warnings and advocate for measures that increased the risk of fraud.

Equally troubling is CISA’s collaboration with mainstream media outlets to downplay the risks associated with mail-in voting. Despite mounting evidence to the contrary, they actively participated in a campaign to mislead the public and suppress dissenting opinions.

Moreover, CISA’s internal documents reveal a series of concerning issues surrounding mail-in voting infrastructure and processes. These include:

• “Links to a newer study that could not conclude that voting in April primary increased the spread of Covid, refuting an earlier study.”
• “The process of mailing and returning ballots.”
• “Implementation of mail-in voting infrastructure and processes within a compressed timeline may also introduce new risk.”
• “For mail-in voting, some of the risk under the control of election officials during in-person voting shifts to outside entities, such as ballot printers, mail processing facilities, and the United States Postal Service.”
• “Integrity attacks on voter registration data and systems represent a comparatively higher risk in a mail-in voting environment when compared to an in-person voting environment.”
• “The outbound and inbound processing of mail-in ballots introduces additional infrastructure and technology, increasing potential scalability of cyber attacks.”
• “Inbound mail-in ballot processes and tabulation take longer than in-person processing, causing tabulation of results to occur more slowly and resulting in more ballots to tabulate following election night.”
• “Disinformation risk to mail-in voting infrastructure and processes is similar to that of in-person voting while utilizing different content. Threat actors may leverage limited understanding regarding mail-in voting processes to mislead and confuse the public.”

Additionally, the documents shed light on alarming tactics employed by CISA, such as the classification of critical discourse on mail-in ballots as cyber attacks on US critical infrastructure. As one expert highlighted, individuals could be targeted simply for expressing skepticism about mail-in ballots on social media, regardless of the context or validity of their claims.

As the dust settles on the tumultuous 2020 election, the truth about CISA’s actions cannot be ignored. Trust in the electoral process hangs in the balance, and any attempts to undermine that trust must be met with swift accountability and transparency.

It’s time for a reckoning. The American people deserve answers. It’s time to uncover the truth behind CISA’s censorship tactics and ensure that the integrity of our elections is upheld at all costs.