We know that the ridiculous January 6 Committee has voted to hold Mark Meadows in contempt as they look to implicate him to the events that transpired on January 6, 2020.

They fully are convinced in their minds that he was part of the problem that day and that he helped enable and execute some sort of coup attempt at the Capitol.

You and I know this is absurd, but they want everyone to believe that this was what really happened.

So what sort of evidence do they have against Mark Meadows exactly? Well, the lying Adam Schiff told us a little bit about it, claiming he had a message from Meadows to instruct Mike Pence to overturn the results.

Here is the message that Schiff claims is the proof:

“On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all.”

But here is the full message:

On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all the electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all — in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedence.

‘No legislative act,’ wrote Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78, ‘contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.’ The court in Hubbard v. Lowe reinforced this truth: ‘That an unconstitutional statute is not a law at all is a proposition no longer open to discussion.’ 226 F. 135, 137 (SDNY 1915), appeal dismissed, 242 U.S. 654 (1916).

Following this rationale, an unconstitutionally appointed elector, like an unconstitutionally enacted statute, is no elector at all.

It’s not that he was trying to command Pence to do it just so President Trump would remain president, he was saying that this is what needed to be done because it was constitutional and because that’s what Alexander Hamilton said to do.