10 Shocking Admissions During Congressional UFO Hearing That Will Blow Your Mind
The House Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs recently held a highly anticipated hearing on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). This hearing brought together witnesses with extensive experience and knowledge in the field, shedding light on some truly astonishing revelations. From the possibility of cover-ups to the existence of non-human biologics, here are the most jaw-dropping exchanges from the hearing.
1. Injury
During the hearing, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) posed a question that sent shockwaves through the room. He asked whistleblower David Grusch if he knew of anyone who had been harmed or injured in efforts to cover up or conceal extraterrestrial technology. Grusch’s response was chilling: “Yes. Personally.”
It is deeply concerning that individuals may have suffered harm or even faced the ultimate consequence of m*rder in pursuit of keeping the truth about UAPs hidden. While Grusch couldn’t provide further details in an open session, his acknowledgment raises serious questions about the lengths some may go to maintain secrecy.
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) asks whistleblower David Grusch if individuals have been "harmed," "injured," or or "murdered" in "efforts to cover up or conceal" UAP tech. pic.twitter.com/8kodsAl2tn
— FDC1989 (@FDC_1989) July 27, 2023
2. Locations
Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) delved into the issue of where the federal government might be storing non-human craft. Grusch shared that, based on interviews with 40 witnesses, he believes the government is indeed in possession of such craft, and he even knows the exact locations. These locations were provided to the Inspector General, indicating that there is a level of awareness within the government about these mysterious objects.
The fact that there are specific locations where non-human craft are stored raises further questions about the extent of the government’s involvement and the level of secrecy surrounding these phenomena.
Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) asks whistleblower David Grusch where UAP are located.
Garcia: "And where?"
Grusch: "I know the exact locations, and those locations were provided to the Inspector General…" pic.twitter.com/YGCRkh224N
— FDC1989 (@FDC_1989) July 27, 2023
3. Fear of Life
One of the most striking moments came when Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) asked Grusch if he had ever been in fear for his life while addressing UAP-related issues. Grusch’s response was a simple “Yes.” This admission highlights the potential dangers associated with uncovering the truth about UAPs and the lengths some may go to silence those who dare to speak out.
The existence of such fear underscores the gravity of the situation and the need for further investigation into these phenomena.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) asks whistleblower David Grusch if he has been "in fear for his life addressing" issues relating to UAPs.
Grusch: "Yes." pic.twitter.com/BDG9HzWysY
— FDC1989 (@FDC_1989) July 27, 2023
4. Cease and Desist
Another disturbing revelation emerged during the hearing when Rep. Luna asked former Navy pilot Ryan Graves about commercial airline pilots receiving cease and desist letters for coming forward with UAP-related safety information. Graves confirmed that he had been made aware of conversations with commercial aviators who had indeed received such orders.
The idea that corporations may prioritize their reputations over the safety of the American people is deeply troubling. It raises concerns about the potential suppression of crucial information that could impact the well-being of airline passengers.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) asks former Navy pilot Ryan Graves if private corporations are sending "cease and desist letters" to commercial aviators who have come forward with safety information relating to UAPs. pic.twitter.com/xtPu3lyVP2
— FDC1989 (@FDC_1989) July 27, 2023
5. Is This China?
Rep. Burchett questioned retired Cmdr. David Fravor about the jamming technology experienced from UAPs. Fravor confirmed that his crew had encountered significant jamming to their radar systems. When asked if he was aware of any of our enemies having that capability, Fravor responded with a resounding “No.”
This exchange suggests that the technology displayed by these unidentified craft is far beyond anything known to be in the possession of our adversaries. It raises questions about the origin and capabilities of these UAPs.
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) asks retired Cmdr. David Fravor about "jamming" from UAPs.
Burchett: "Are you aware of any of our enemies that have that capability?"
Fravor: "No." pic.twitter.com/L1ppal1Sdq
— FDC1989 (@FDC_1989) July 27, 2023
6. Aggressive Behavior (Human and Non-Human)
Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) engaged in a fascinating exchange with Grusch, exploring reports of aggressive and disturbing behavior exhibited by both UAPs and people within the federal government. Grusch noted that multiple colleagues of his had been physically injured, indicating a level of aggression from both the unidentified craft and individuals within the government.
The revelation of such aggression and disturbing behavior raises concerns about the intentions and nature of these phenomena. It also suggests the presence of a complex and potentially dangerous dynamic at play.
Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) asks whistleblower David Grusch is there has been "aggressive or hostile" activity from UAPs or by "people within the federal government."
Grusch: "Both. … What I personally witnessed — myself and my wife — was very disturbing." pic.twitter.com/zWHaEdOVf2
— FDC1989 (@FDC_1989) July 27, 2023
7. What Do They Look Like?
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) sought to understand the common appearance of UAPs witnessed by Navy pilots. Ryan Graves, a former Navy pilot, described the craft primarily as “dark gray or black cubes inside of a clear sphere.” This unique visual description provides insight into the physical characteristics of these unidentified objects.
Understanding the appearance of UAPs can help researchers and investigators identify patterns and potentially discern more about their origin and purpose.
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) asks former Navy pilot Ryan Graves to describe UAPs that have been "sighted by different pilots."
Graves: "We were primarily seeing dark gray or black cubes inside of a clear sphere." pic.twitter.com/g3bLcAbFfz
— FDC1989 (@FDC_1989) July 27, 2023
8. Holman Rule
Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) expressed his desire for Congress to have access to classified information related to UAPs. He stated that if access is denied, he would personally volunteer to initiate the Holman rule against any personnel, program, or agency that denies access to Congress.
The Holman rule grants Congress the power to reduce the salary or even fire a government employee, as well as cut funding from certain programs. This statement underscores the determination of some members of Congress to uncover the truth about UAPs and their commitment to holding those who obstruct transparency accountable.
Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN): "If that access is denied, I will personally volunteer to initiate the Holman rule against any personnel, or any program, or any agency that denies access to Congress." pic.twitter.com/l0A3yxb63u
— FDC1989 (@FDC_1989) July 26, 2023
9. Non-Human Recoveries
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) posed a question that sent shockwaves through the room. She asked Grusch if we have the bodies of the pilots who piloted the crashed UAPs. Grusch’s response was nothing short of astonishing. He confirmed that “non-human” biologics were recovered alongside the crashed craft, according to people with direct knowledge of the program.
This revelation raises profound questions about the nature of these beings and their connection to the UAPs. It opens up possibilities that extend far beyond what many could have imagined.
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) asks whistleblower David Grusch about "pilots" of crashed UAPs.
Mace: "Were they human or non-human biologics?"
Grusch: "Non-human — and that was the assessment of people with direct knowledge on the program…" pic.twitter.com/XZp5Qunynv
— FDC1989 (@FDC_1989) July 27, 2023
10. What Next?
Rep. Mace also inquired about which agencies and contractors should be called into the next UAP hearing. Grusch indicated that he could provide a specific cooperative and hostile witness list of individuals with direct knowledge after the hearing.
This development suggests that there are individuals with vital information who could shed further light on the UAP phenomenon. The next hearing could potentially bring forth even more astonishing revelations.
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) asks whistleblower David Grusch what agencies or contractors should be called into the next UAP hearing.
Grusch: "I can give you a specific cooperative and hostile witness list … after the hearing." pic.twitter.com/nOVq2RbJ79
— FDC1989 (@FDC_1989) July 27, 2023
The House UAP hearing brought to light a series of astonishing revelations that challenge our understanding of the world around us. From the possibility of cover-ups and aggressive behavior to the existence of non-human biologics, these exchanges underscore the need for further investigation and transparency. As we continue to explore the mysteries of UAPs, it is clear that we are only scratching the surface of a complex and enigmatic phenomenon that demands our attention.
Additional Information: The brand message is centered around promoting curiosity, open-mindedness, and a commitment to uncovering the truth. The tone should be informative, engaging, and slightly mysterious, reflecting the intrigue surrounding UAPs.