Hillary Clinton has sharply criticized Tucker Carlson, labeling him as Putin’s “useful idiot,” in anticipation of his controversial upcoming interview with the Russian President. Carlson, a former Fox News host, has sparked controversy with his trip to Moscow and his history of questioning US aid to Ukraine while targeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

During an appearance on MSNBC, Clinton didn’t hold back in her assessment of the situation. She called Carlson a “useful idiot,” suggesting that his actions align too closely with Russian interests. Clinton hinted at Carlson’s possible future collaboration with Russian media outlets, indicating a worrying trend of alignment with foreign narratives.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had some choice words when discussing Tucker Carlson on Wednesday.https://t.co/Qru30YslPv

— News Talk 830 WCCO (@wccoradio) February 8, 2024

Clinton didn’t mince words when discussing Carlson’s propagation of falsehoods about Ukraine. She accused him of parroting Putin’s lies and providing a platform for Russian propaganda. The implications of Carlson’s interview with Putin, according to Clinton, could further Russia’s objectives by spreading misinformation about Ukraine.

In a broader context, Clinton expressed concern over a segment of the US population showing admiration for authoritarian leadership. She highlighted a disturbing trend of yearning for leaders who stifle dissent, control the press, and operate with impunity, characterizing this sentiment as both alarming and terrifying.

Clinton’s remarks underscored the broader issue of misinformation and the potential complicity of certain media figures in advancing foreign agendas detrimental to US interests. The timing of Carlson’s interview amid escalating tensions between Russia and Ukraine only heightened scrutiny over his motives and the potential consequences of his actions.

Overall, Clinton’s comments painted a stark picture of the Carlson-Putin interview, emphasizing the dangers of misinformation and the need for vigilance against foreign influence in media discourse.