Things are certainly getting heated between Tucker Carlson and Sidney Powell.

Tucker said on his show that Sidney hasn’t provided the evidence that he wanted in regard to the election fraud. He also said that she got rude with him.

Tucker said,

“We took Sidney Powell seriously. We had no intention of fighting with her. We simply wanted to see the details. How could you not? So we invited her on the show. We would have given her the whole hour. We would have given her the whole week, actually, and listened patiently the whole time. It’s that big a story.”

“But she never sent any evidence. Not a page,” Carlson said. “When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her. When we checked with others around the Trump campaign, people in positions of authority, they told us Powell has never given them any evidence either. Nor did she provide any today at the press conference.”

Here’s the video of Tucker calling her out.

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson slams Sidney Powell for making wild claims, but providing no evidence. pic.twitter.com/FPCAZ0KHEf

— (((Jason Rantz))) on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz) November 20, 2020

Now, here is how Sidney Powell responded to Maria Bartiromo when she asked her about the situation between her and Tucker.

Maria Bartiromo: How did you respond to Tucker Carlson? Did you get angry with the show because they texted you and asked you to provide evidence of what you’re alleging?

Sidney Powell: No, I didn’t get angry with the request to provide evidence in fact I sent an affidavit to Tucker that I had not even attached to a pleading yet to help him understand the situation and I offered him another witness who could explain the mathematics of the statistical evidence far better than I can. I’m not really a numbers person. But he was very insulting, demanding and rude and I told him not to contact me again in those terms.

Trump attorney Sidney Powell fires back: Tucker Carlson was 'insulting, demanding, and rude' — https://t.co/leMZ1Scj7d — for @dcexaminer pic.twitter.com/CTDKxZnJql

— Daniel Chaitin (@danielchaitin7) November 20, 2020

I’ve got to say I’m a bit torn on this. I think Tucker Carlson is very honest and genuine. I don’t speak for Sidney Powell, but I could see there being a misunderstanding.

Here’s what I think is happening: people, Tucker included, don’t see sworn affidavits from witnesses as evidence. It is evidence. If me and four of my friends witnessed you commit a murder, we are evidence. And the fact that they are sworn affidavits, they carry a lot of weight because the penalty for lying is perjury and punishable by prison.

I’m not sure what more evidence they’re really looking for. I guess it would be pertaining to who is behind all of this. Who are the key players?

Because based on what I’ve seen, we know how they did it, we know what they did and we have records of it. We have hundreds or even thousands of witnesses, plus we have testimony from at least one election fraud expert who explained how what happened is physically impossible.