Tulsi Gabbard actually made a very smart move in regards to her election campaign.

While all the other Democrats are sprinting to the left as fast as they can to prove who is more “progressive”, Gabbard took a step back in the other direction. She actually did something that the other Democrats won’t do and that is she drew a line for when abortions “should” no longer take place.

Gabbard said,

“I think that there should be some restrictions though,” she told Rubin. She went on to suggest she believes in a “cutoff point” where women could get an abortion only in dire circumstances. “I think the third trimester. Unless a woman’s life or severe health consequences is at risk, then there shouldn’t be an abortion in the third trimester.”

That’s not exactly a hard line on abortion, and it certainly doesn’t appear that Gabbard supports any universal restrictions on the third-trimester abortion procedure, just that she’s currently unsure of where she stands on it. The difficulty with “life and health” exceptions, across the board, is that they can be applied liberally, and Gabbard wasn’t specific in what she feels constitutes a “dire” circumstance that might necessitate an exception. (Daily Wire)

While it is still despicable, she’s honestly going to better identify with most liberals thoughts on the matter, because regardless of what these crazy leftist politicians are thinking, most of the country do not agree with these radically far left ideas that are becoming to popularly pushed by the Democrats.

Gabbard used to actually be pro-life and still seems to have some feelings for her unborn neighbors albeit very little.

Nonetheless, she cares more about the unborn children in the womb than every single other Democrat in the field running for the highest office in the land.

Photo Credit: Linda Mozuku